Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:09
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Android 16's new beta makes changing call settings easier - Android Police
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Do you think the constitution and laws should be taught in school?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Warning Issued To Minnesotans About Running Fans Overnight - Duluth Country Radio
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Scottie Scheffler Calls US Open at Oakmont 'The Hardest Golf Course...Maybe Ever' - Bleacher Report
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Who is Meghan Markle and why is she so controversial on the Internet?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.